Over the years, at Studio 70 in Berkeley, we’ve been excited about many new and innovative initiatives taking place in the afterschool Jewish learning space. We’ve made it a priority of our organization to share our own work as well as celebrate the work of others. And we’ve continued to highlight the need for much greater investments to support the field. That’s because there are amazing programs being run after school, in supplemental community-based programs, religious schools and Hebrew schools throughout North America; but you wouldn’t know it.

Hundreds if not thousands of talented, imaginative educators can be found in these communities doing fantastic work, but their stories aren’t being told. And much if not all of their exciting work remains siloed. In the absence of a national organization tasked with and funded to develop the infrastructure to support the needs of this domain, the time has come to adopt a different approach – professionalize the field from the bottom up.

What is a professional? Professionals understand their work as an expression of some of their values. Professionals take continuing education and ongoing skills development seriously; seeking opportunities for learning and improvement. Professionals are likely to have specialized training. Professionals’ days are never done – they think about their craft when they’re not at their place of work on the clock. They are passionate about the impacts they make and interested in sharing their work and contributing to the field.

These are the kinds of educators we want engaging with our children. And for many if not most of the educators in the after school learning space, this describes who they are and how they see themselves. If only we’d recognize them as such.

Afterschool Jewish educators are on the front lines of Jewish learning for hundreds of thousands of children making Jewish life and learning meaningful and joyful every day. They support our kids and families to build positive Jewish identities. Yet too often they are undervalued and left out of larger conversations about Jewish learning after school.

Jewish after school educators understand the needs of children in ways traditional teachers do not. They appreciate the limits of their students knowing they’ve already had a long day of school. They adopt a variety of strategies making learning joyous and effective while not burning kids out. And they nurture complicated social and emotional needs following a long day of school. Jewish after school educators are master experiential educators, often with deep and intuitive understandings of children’s needs. And, for many, they represent the only Jewish educator an individual will ever meet.

Our plan is simple, to create a space to listen to the voices of these educators, celebrate them and their work, and in so doing contribute to the professionalization of the field.

To that end, we’re excited to announce a new conference devoted exclusively to innovations in Jewish learning after school – Voices From the Field. We believe there are many shining lights in the Jewish learning after school space. We believe there’s a large community of professional educators who’ve embraced this domain and identify as professionals and educators in it. And we know if we work together, if we develop the infrastructure, and we combine our efforts we’ll be successful in ushering in a new era for after school, supplemental Jewish youth learning.

We’ve seen this develop for Jewish camping, for Jewish early childhood education, for Jewish outdoor education, and for Jewish day school education. The time has come for the professionalization of the field of afterschool Jewish educators and we along with many of our friends and colleagues are stepping up to the plate to say we can do it. We need to do it, we owe it to our students and their families to make these learning experiences as excellent as they can be.
​
With special thanks to the Covenant Foundation and our growing list of partners, Hebrew Union College, the Jewish Education Project, and the American Jewish University. Look for a formal announcement of the Voices from the Field conference and if you want to learn more now, visit www.studio-70.org/conference.

​Every day at 1:45 pm the announcement is made in the Edah afterschool program, “Ha Misada Petucha” (the restaurant is open). The Misada is part full-service restaurant, part immersive language learning space, and it hums with activity each day as children sit at the counter and order something to eat.

The walls are covered in placemats from Israeli restaurants. A menu is posted each day using images of foods rather than words to read. The different blessings for food are on the walls. Everything is in Hebrew. The Misada is almost always full of kids, ordering, singing and chatting in Hebrew while sitting at the counter. Eating, cooking, and even hanging out in the kitchen all offer great opportunities to engage in meaningful language learning that sticks. Here’s why:

Language learning and food pair wellThere’s no better place to learn a second language than in a kitchen or restaurant, surrounded by food. With just a few simple phrases mastered, much of the ordering experience can be done in the second language. Food nouns are wonderful first words and easy to remember when associated with tastes and smells. You can play with food vocab at home, too. Everyone loves to teach their family new words for the foods they eat every day.

Kitchens and restaurants are full of propsWhen children learn their first language it’s usually at home, surrounded by the smells, tastes, and sites they’re most familiar with. While parents don’t always point and gesture to help with understanding, children listen and watch all the time, making meaning and connections. It’s how we learn. When creating and working in immersive language learning environments, props are important tools. The opportunity to point at foods and utensils, to make faces that demonstrate tastes and sensations, are all wonderful techniques for language learning and a part of every kitchen and restaurant. Additionally, children pay attention when they know there are hints and tools for understanding all around them. In our Misada eyes are always moving around the room, tracking the servers’ hands and facial cues for hints to help understand. And the kitchen has so many props, which makes for the perfect language learning space.

Cooking and recipes are great for learning a languageOur Misada also functions as a teaching kitchen. Every week there are multiple opportunities to bake and cook in the Misada, and it’s all in Hebrew. Educators explore recipes in Hebrew with the kids using songs and games. Counting and measuring plays a big part, and offers great introductory vocabulary, which provide immediate returns on the investments. Kids get to eat the food they cook. And after working through the Hebrew, it feels great to taste success and understanding. “I baked that cake all by myself and we only spoke Hebrew when we did it. Even the recipe was in Hebrew”.

New foods and new language learning both require taking risksIt’s not easy to learn a new language. Practicing speaking a new language can be very disarming. It’s a risk to try making new sounds and stringing words together and the kitchen counter is a perfect place to take those risks. New foods and tastes often accompany new words in our Misada. Trying new cuisines add risk-taking dimensions that are both fun and comforting for the learner. We are all in this together and we are all uncomfortable, and that makes risk taking feel a lot less risky, and a lot more fun.

Food engages all our sensesWhen we learn a language while eating, making, and playing with food, all our senses are working together, and that’s engaging. Our eyes are taking in not only the new foods but the preparation of them as well. Our ears hear the crunch of eating, the chop of preparing, and the sounds of Hebrew as servers and learners work together to understand each other. The smells of the food are an exciting reminder of what’s going on. Our sense of touch is engaged as we cook, eat, and pass forks or salt. And taste – there’s nothing like a taste memory to situate itself in the brain and stick for a long time.
​
Hebrew immersion is often seen as an impossibility in the supplemental education world. You don’t need a fully immersive school or program to create moments of language immersion and opportunities for authentic language learning. Try baking challah for next Shabbat using a Hebrew cookbook and only speaking Hebrew to the kids. You’ll see how immersive language learning moments are possible in a variety of settings and how they offer youth learners opportunities for fun and meaningful engagement. Who’s hungry for lunch?

On a recent afternoon, a group of second graders stand around a table. Taped the long way down the middle of the table is a strip of blue construction paper, a river. On either side of the river, on the table, are piles of Legos. As we begin the year, the children are building models that reflect how they feel about learning Hebrew. “Learning Hebrew is kind of like being in a boat that’s moving really slowly, and maybe sinking a bit.”

“I built a bridge over the river because learning Hebrew feels like a challenge.”

“It reminds me of blasting off on a rocket.”

This is one of the ways we’ve been using Legos in our afterschool program, Edah. It all started a couple years ago when we hosted our first text study program using Legos, Tikkun Lego Shavuot. Over 50 parent/child hevrutot (learning pairs) showed up for an evening of exploring Jewish text and ideas through…. playing with Legos. At the time I thought we had stumbled onto the next best totally obvious idea nobody had thought of before. Then I started poking around a bit. I was wrong. Educators have been using Legos in learning for decades, and there are some really good reasons why.

Legos Are funWho doesn’t love Legos? Big kids, little kids. Even the long-lost children inside many of us adults, when sitting in front of a pile of Legos, can’t help but begin to build. Everyone (just about everyone) has played with Legos before and a familiar material helps level the playing field of a given activity or program. But they’re not just familiar. While design might speak to certain people and skill sets, Lego building is amazingly democratic and equalizing. When working with Legos, there’s truly a job for everyone. Legos draw learners in empowering everyone to create, interpret, construct, and play.

Legos Are reusableLegos are not disposable and, more than that, they’re valued precisely because they can be used again and again. Children understand that about the material. They know that whatever they build will ultimately be destroyed in order to build something new, again. It’s a powerful realization for children to have. Lego’s are all about process. And then, rebirth. Unlike other materials that may be thrown away at the end of the project, Legos are taken apart. And while there’s no taking the project home to show parents or to put on the mantel, what does stay with the learners are the stories. The description of the product, the story of the process, and the idea behind the design.

Legos Concretize the AbstractLegos, like other kinds of modeling, concretize the abstract. Whether exploring a narrative, a concept, or even an experience, Legos are a powerful modeling tool able to be used to visualize any number of things. We use Legos to build installations that explore elements of stories or narratives. At Edah, children might be introduced to a midrash or asked to reflect on an experience or an idea, using modeling and Legos. A group can explore the midrash that Abraham and Sarah’s tent had no walls and then design tents or structures they believe would be perfect for hosting. Legos can also be used to unpack experiences. We’ve prompted children to use Legos to “design a machine that will help you stay away from your worst bad habit” or “to build something that symbolizes Tikkun Olam.”

Legos give even pre-literate children the ability to express complex ideas and concepts. “Legos are a good introduction to communicating ideas with physical objects…. Putting things together and taking them apart got me interested in how things work, and by the time I was an undergraduate, I knew I wanted to be an engineer.” – Tiffany Tseng, engineer in the MIT Media Lab/ParentingScience.com

Legos Are a Cognitive WorkoutSome folks extol the virtues of the Lego building kits. They focus on the skills kids develop when using building directions included in the box, the spatial awareness required to replicate a design, and the ability to identify patterns. While we don’t include directions in our Lego work, the problem-solving involved in imagining and executing a design is a great brain workout. If the wall needs to be perfectly flat, or if every row must be a certain length, do the math. Figure out the many different ways to create four walls that are 10 pips long (a pip is the official name of the little bumps that attach) and eight blocks high. Or determine how to make a roof twice as big as the house. Or a tower tall enough to cast a shadow of a particular size. Or perhaps there’s a pattern that needs to be replicated – all great learning activities.
​
In the age of educational technology, learning apps, and so on, Legos offers a welcome alternative that feels both old school and innovative all at the same time. They can be used to explore the weekly Torah portion. They’re wonderful for practicing making the shapes of the Aleph Bet. They can be used for imaginative play and also to concretize more conceptual thinking. And they can be disinfected and used over and over again! Not to mention there are families in every community with boxes of Legos in their basements, ready to donate them if only someone would ask.

One of my children counts the money in her piggy bank every Sunday after she gets her allowance. And the counting has become a bit of a ritual, a favorite activity of hers. She turns the little hollow elephant upside down. Takes the rubber plug out from the bottom, and shakes it over her bed as the coins fall out. Recently we asked her if she wanted to start keeping track of her counts in a book or on a piece of paper? “No way Abba, I like to count it each week. It’s fun. … I saved that money all by myself and it’s important to me.”

We are counters, all of us, says neuropsychologist Brian Butterworth – author of The Mathematical Brain. Hardwired into our brain is a sense of number. An inclination to order and organize the world according to sets and sequences and … numbers. Even remote tribes with no language for numbers, according to Butterworth, still order and organize reality according to groups of similar size … and number. Counting appears to be a human response to reality. It’s a comfort to know how big it is, long it is, short it is; and as my daughter explained, it’s also a way we message value and connectedness. “I count the things that are important to me.”

And as Jews, we count. We count the days in the week until Shabbat. We count the number of people in synagogue until we reach a minyan. Halacha is particularly concerned with counting, numbers and amounts matter, and therefore not only do we count but we are also concerned with accuracy. Not just counting, but the count itself, is important. Days, hours and people; people of fighting age, stars in the sky, heights of walls, the number of Israelites through census, and so on and so forth … are all counted, because we value those things and want to know and understand them better. We count them. Over and over again. Which is why it was rather shocking to learn how little we know about how many children are enrolled in supplemental Jewish learning programs in North America. That’s right, we don’t really count.

There have been efforts to count the numbers of young people who attend Jewish day schools and camps in North America . You can find numbers of synagogue members in a given city or region. We like to keep track of intermarriage rates, of the numbers of people who make Aliyah, and, not to mention, of the number of Federation donors. Most recently we’ve realized the need to count the number of children in Jewish preschools. But as a community, there is no ongoing effort to keep track of the size of what researchers speculate to be the most populous Jewish learning space in North America – supplemental Jewish learning. We don’t even actually know how many such programs there are. So we have to wonder, why have we so infrequently counted these young people and paid better attention to this domain?

While it might not be important to a single school, classroom, or afterschool program, how many children there are in the supplemental Jewish learning space across Northern California; when it comes to funders, national initiatives and possible interventions meant to respond to bigger trends or needs, knowing the size of the population being served in this sector of Jewish education. .

At this point you might be wondering, is it true? Do we really not have a count of the hundreds of thousands of children attending our Sunday schools, religious schools, and Hebrew school each year? And is the article right? Does the lack of a dependable, regular counting of students in supplementary programs tell us something about our priorities and values as a community. In 2007, a study commissioned by the Avi Chai Foundation on the state of supplemental Jewish learning in the United States, received data from 1,720 supplemental schools. The reports goes on to suggest the real number could be significantly higher as hundreds of synagogues didn’t report.
     
In a 2013 Jdata newsletter, then Director Dr. Amy Sales, wrote “There is less research on part-time schools than on day schools, overnight camps, and other arenas of Jewish education” and then went on to announce what was to be an annual census of the supplemental Jewish learning space. In connection to the many different approaches and opinions of supplemental Jewish learning she further wrote “The one point of agreement is that the part-time schools have been an essential but beleaguered part of the educational landscape.” The first round of the Jdata census found 1,848 supplemental schools in the United States. While the Avi Chai study was fairly broad, looking at the quality and quantity of programming as well as counting numbers, the Jdata initiative looked at numbers alone. We propose, as a field – supplemental Jewish education, to take it upon ourselves to do this work. We know how to self organize. Our networks are far reaching, and in partnership with the central agencies and schools of education, we believe the most comprehensive count and snap shop of our domain can be achieved.
     
At Studio 70: A Jewish Learning Laboratory in Berkeley CA we care about the quantity and quality of the supplementary jewish learning landscape. We want to know how many part-time Jewish learning programs there are in North America, how many families, and kids attend these programs. We want to know how these programs are organized, if these programs are sufficiently resourced, and what impact they are having on participants and communities. So, we have designed a survey to collect data from supplemental Jewish learning programs.

And we need help from the field – we can’t count the people in your program if we don’t know you are there and what you do. If you want the programs and people that are part of the supplemental Jewish education landscape to be counted and to count We need you, our colleagues working in the supplemental Jewish learning space in North America to complete a survey we have designed which you can find at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PTJewishEd. We also need you to forward this survey link on to whomever else you think should be counted – and encourage them to complete it.

​It is up to us to mobilize our networks, professional associations, national movements, and social connections so that we too can stand up and be counted. Together, we can revive this simple yet essential project – a landscape study of the field – and demonstrate exactly how much supplemental learning does, in fact, count and that it is worth attention and investment.
 

Whether it’s Steven Covey who said “Interdependent people combine their own efforts, with the efforts of others to achieve their greatest success” or……

Michael Jordan who said “Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships,” the lesson comes through loud and clear and echoes one of the deepest and truest Jewish values.

“It is not good for people to be alone” (Genesis 2:18). We actualize our highest selves when working together.

Which is why it’s not surprising that we continue to hear more and more announcements for cohort-based professional development programs. They work. Fellowships, intensives, and other cohort-based service learning programs support the growth of participants while they simultaneously gain valuable work experience. These programs meet the diverse needs of participants who each are looking to make meaning out of a shared experience, but often do so in different ways (think learning styles). And they offer a structure for ongoing professional development and growth long after the intensive ends resulting in stronger programming and more effective staff. “Students who have the opportunity to develop and build their personal, social, and academic skills within a pedagogical community are more advanced in their ability to foster new communities within their professional careers” (Cohort Based Learning – College Quarterly 2005, v7).

But don’t be fooled, while many of the most well-known cohort base learning programs are offered by universities and larger organizations, smaller organizations can benefit greatly from the model as well.

I run a small afterschool program in Berkeley, California, and three years ago we launched our own modest fellowship program, attempting to address both the needs of the Jewish education community broadly, as well as our own organizational needs. We saw college graduates looking for full-time employment with an interest in education. We observed a field lacking entry level positions that included comprehensive training for emerging educators. And we in Berkeley needed well trained, less expensive staff for our programming.

We don’t have a big building. We don’t have a large endowment. But we know what we do well. With the generous support of the Covenant Foundation, and the willingness of our board to take a chance, we piloted the Jewish Learning Innovation Corps or JLIC, a full-time work study program launching the careers of a new cadre of Jewish educational innovators trained in our approach to Hebrew-intensive after school learning. Three years later, here are some of our biggest lessons.

The Model
While we believed cohort-based professional development would deliver the kind of transformative, long lasting learning we wanted to achieve, what we didn’t know was if the cohort based approach would work on a smaller scale. We knew our afterschool program would never be so large as to require 20 or 30 teachers, so we wondered if we could create the kind of social experience young adult participants are often looking for.
What we found was that our smaller sized program resulted in an intimacy and closeness that proved to be valuable and very special to the fellows. Our fellows grew close to one another quickly, and their care for one another and belief in one another’s’ abilities translated into a sense of calm, purpose, and confidence throughout the program – qualities the children responded to. “We are all learners” and “we are always learning” are words we hear a lot now.

The Applicant
Would a supplemental Jewish education program – an afterschool program – appeal to the kind of applicants we were looking for? Could such a program and opportunity overcome the bias against part time or after school Jewish learning?

The answer is yes. As we spoke with applicants from around the country we found that not only was the intensive work study model appealing to them, but they harbored few of the negative associations and assumptions of part time Jewish education we often hear from parents. If anything, they had been through supplemental programs as children and were excited to bring their experiences to bear.

The Financial Model
For years our afterschool program, like so many other part-time programs, hired part-time educators as staff. Competition for these educators is fierce. We were unsure what the trade off would be if we replaced part-time teachers making high hourly wages with a full-time staff engaged in intensive professional development, working for a lower hourly rate? After three years, this is the last and most complicated challenge to solve.

At first, it seemed like a simple question of arithmetic. We spent on average less than 5% more per staff person per year, to have less experienced, less expensive staff people working full-time as part of the JLIC program. But less experienced staff cost in different ways. Infrastructure was needed to support them in their training. Faculty had to be hired, and that costs money. While the direct staffing costs for a full-time fellow are essentially the same as the cost of a higher-paid, more experienced, part-time employee, the infrastructure costs – both one time and ongoing – to support the cohort remain high and difficult to sustain without dedicated funding for the program.

Impact on the program
There is no way to overstate the positive effect the fellowship has had on our afterschool program. Full-time positions message to employees that what they’re doing is important and that the organization takes them and their work seriously. Full-time employment comes with medical benefits, which are crucial for young adults as they work towards independence, and full-time positions professionalize the experience. For the field of part-time Jewish education, this is huge. This results in programming with more intention, much greater planning, greater dynamism, and a professional culture committed to the model and its strategies.

Cohort-based service learning programs offer a compelling model for aligning the needs of emerging educators with those of schools of all sizes – you don’t need a million dollars to make it happen. While the approach does require additional infrastructure, the investments are on par with the kinds of investments a school would make to ensure excellence.
​
“One who studies Torah in order to teach will be given the opportunity both to study and to teach. One who studies in order to practice will be given the opportunity to study, to teach, to observe, and to practice.” (Pirke Avot 4:6)

http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/cohort-based-learning-on-local-scale/?utm_source=Feb+13%2C+2018&utm_campaign=Tue+Feb+13&utm_medium=email​

According to a 2013 JData article, there are approximately 1848 congregational schools in America, in addition to the other supplemental programs being run independently by JCCs and other community organizations. That’s over 200,000 students each year are enrolled in some kind of supplemental Jewish learning program. Twice as many children are enrolled in supplemental, part time Jewish learning programs in the U.S. than there are students in non-orthodox Jewish day schools. If the vast majority of children doing any formal or informal Jewish learning are doing so after school in supplemental programs, which begs the question: why aren’t more resources and attention paid to our largest demographic of youth learners?

In a recent article, “It’s Time to Invest in Part-Time Jewish Education,” Anna Marx made a few key observations about the challenges and needs facing supplemental Jewish education. First: supplemental schools and part time Jewish education in general need a lot more attention and resources. Second: the death of Jewish learning after school has been greatly exaggerated.

Anna’s article was part of a series that saw contributions from central agencies, foundations, and academic institutions. In the hope of adding to this important conversation, and contributing to what clearly must be a paradigm shift in the way we think about and value Jewish education, I am calling for a second round of articles, a response from the field. Great things are happening and we can be doing a lot more to understand and scale successful approaches.

To all the innovators among us, to those of us exploring new approaches and techniques, working in new ways to achieve transformative Jewish learning, the time has come to step out of the “innovation sector” and speak up in our communities. We need to start sharing good and successful practices, approaches, trainings, and even curricula. We have an opportunity and perhaps obligation to shape the future of supplemental Jewish education. To those direct service organizations that have recently launched fellowships, trainings, and so on: your voices are critical to building a movement of change and renewal in the field.

And I’m not just talking about those of us working with school age children. Whether you’re working in teen engagement, young adult engagement, and even adult learning, you have important experiences and expertise to share with the wider community. Good ideas that work in one part of the country, or resonate with one demographic group, just might work in another.

To start things off, I’d like to share some of what we’ve learned in our afterschool program, Edah, and why you might consider the model for your school, shul, JCC, or community. (For more information about the model and movement, check out the Nitzan Network.)

1. Kids are people, too
The elementary school kids who fill our programs, spend all day long at school. There, they must conform to structures: sit when they’re told, stand when they’re told, eat when they’re told, and stay focused until they’re dismissed. For any adult who’s ever taken a night class while working, working all day and then going to school afterwards isn’t fun. It isn’t fun for our kids either.

The afterschool model is in part about honoring the humanity of our kids. They don’t want to trade one desk for another. They need rest, agency, and the opportunity to slow down and be heard on their own terms after a long day of conforming. Our model focuses on meeting those needs first. Experiential education is preferred, frontal instruction is almost non-existent, student choice is prioritized, and “joy” and “fun” are key metrics in evaluating the program.

Most importantly, we listen to our kids, seeking to understand their needs and honoring and respecting how they want to spend their time. By embracing the idea that after school time is theirs and honoring the fact that kids are people too with their own sets of needs and interests, Jewish learning after school shifts from being an imposition to a time when the kids get to grow and develop as Jews and as people with guidance, but on their terms.

2. Parents also have needs
Scheduling is one of the greatest challenges for parents. At the beginning of every school year, parents are faced with the challenge of working out each child’s various schedules, transportation, and after school plans. Making room for, and working out transportation to and from religious school, soccer, ballet, play practice and so on is a perennial problem. The popular approach to supplemental or congregational models pits Jewish education against all the other extra curricular activities and imposes an additional transportation burden. The unintended consequence of that approach is Jewish education becomes complicated and burdensome as parents work to figure out the logistics.

By contrast, the after school model says to parents, “We’re open every day. Work out your schedule and use us to fill in the gaps.” And just like that, the program becomes an important resource to parents as they work out after school plans for their kids. When a program is able to provide transportation from school, it becomes an even more valuable resource.

As much as parents need Jewish education for their children, parents’ needs revolve equally if not more around after school care and scheduling. If you can align those two needs, as the afterschool model does, you reframe the entire family’s experiences of Jewish education in powerful and positive ways.

3. More is more
When it comes to learning, the more you practice, the longer you spend, the more you get out of it. Sure, at a certain point returns diminish, but when we’re talking about part time, supplemental learning, more is truly more; more time = greater impact. This is another huge reason why the afterschool program model should be considered by everyone. When afterschool learning is reframed, not as an extracurricular but as a five day a week resource, and when the model directly responds to children’s and parent’s needs, families engage more deeply and parents send their kids more often. Kids are happier and actually excited to go. Parents are happy to send their children and marvel at how different their own experiences in Hebrew school were in comparison to their children’s, resulting in many more hours a week of engagement in Jewish life and learning. It’s as simple as that. This translates into more learning, more joy, and more meaning as participants form communities similar to those found in Jewish camping and other immersive experiences.

If a child spends 3 1⁄2 hours a day, four days a week in a Jewish learning afterschool program, a lot of learning and exploration and growth can happen. Even compared to some community day school models that include one period of Jewish studies and one period of Hebrew studies along with six other periods devoted to general studies, the afterschool program model might just result in a more immersive and effective Jewish learning experience.

4. Teachers are professionals
The last strength I’ll share of the afterschool movement is the impact that more days a week, longer hours, and greater stability has on educators. Afterschool programs require more full time staff. A five-day-a-week program demands greater staffing, more people and more hours. When educators don’t have to pull together five different teaching gigs to make ends meet, the message is their work matters and we want to support them to do it well.

If we want to see supplemental Jewish learning thrive, professionalizing the field has to extend beyond heads of schools. That means offering people actual career opportunities. Full time employment with vacation time and benefits sends the message that, “Your job is real and we are going to set you up to succeed because your success is important to us.” Educators know what people say about Sunday school. They know the narrative we’re all trying to change as much as anyone. Only to them it’s even more personal. When we ask them to be baby sitters, when we don’t give them the time, support, and resources to achieve the goals we set for them, we imply that the goals, the learners, and even the educators themselves don’t matter that much.

Jewish learning afterschool programs are certainly not the only new approach in town, and they too have their limitations, but they work. If you’re interested in learning more about how they work, and how it might serve your community, we love to share.


http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/shifting-the-supplemental-jewish-learning-paradigm/

My first Grateful Dead Concert was in 1989. I was in the 7th grade and there was no turning back. I was hooked. When I was 15 I ran off with the band for the first time, much to my parent’s chagrin. When I was 17 I dropped out of high school to follow the band around full time, and today I continue to consider my Grateful Dead family as among my closest friends and community, and the music – the music of my soul.

So the recent article written by my friends and colleagues at Upstart titled Engaging With Empathy, published here on eJP caught my eye. First, because it began with a quote from a favorite Grateful Dead song of mine and then because of how I felt it misunderstood that song, and its relevance to the world we Jewish educators work in, and the struggles we face in adapting to a new engagement reality.

The article explored some of the ways in which we might more effectively engage young adults (the holy grail of engagement) in Jewish life. It posited that us Jewish professionals, our programs, and organizations are often confused, lacking focus as we try to “respond to the needs of an ever evolving community…” It went on to explore what might be at the heart of this phenomenon, touching on some recent cultural and sociological trends like the DIY culture and a growing discomfort with particularist identities, concluding with a couple suggestions for how “institutions” might respond to these challenges – human centered design and an evolved understanding of membership and affiliation that provides for the fluidity these new “consumers” are looking for.

Yes – young adults (and just about everyone else) have evolved into more sophisticated consumers. In order to successfully create and sell more and more products, businesses need to do just what the article is calling for. Design products that speak to real needs of users and structure the engagement experience of each of those products in such a way that enables customers to opt in and out as they see fit. This is the consumer culture.
But I don’t think that’s the lesson to be learned from the holy words of Robert Hunter nor do I think those are the lessons to be learned regarding engagement with Judaism and Jewish community.

In the for profit world, I could imagine the conversation taking the tone of an ever changing marketplace, one of fickle customers with no brand loyalty. Generations have grown up in a remote control world which made changing the channel as easy as pushing a button and channel surfing, a metaphor for the never ending search for the next best thing, for an upgrade.

But community works differently, and ultimately that is what we offer. In a variety of shapes, flavors, and sizes, Judaism and engagement is all about community. And community is not a commodity. While we might switch gym memberships or cable providers or cell phone brands on a whim, depending on our ever changing needs and interests, we don’t engage with community in the same way. Community is where I look for meaning and relationships, and the choice to engage or disengage is a profound one. The transactional relationship we have with things is not the kind of relationship we look to form with community, quite the opposite.

While we are more particular about how we spend our money and who and what we choose to affiliate with, “renting experiences” is not the metaphor we should be using to better understand how community does and doesn’t form today. Burners don’t typically jump in and out of Burning Man. One time participants might, but those engaged in the co-creation that is essential to the Burning Man experience do so because of a deep sense of connection and commitment to the vision. They are not renters. They are Burners.

But perhaps the best example of this can be learned from the Grateful Dead themselves, and their extended community. I am a Deadhead. It is the music, the culture, the society and it’s values that drew me in years ago and it was my feeling of kinship with other deadheads that inspired me to “co-create.” There was no renting. There was only deep engagement, and those weekend warriors who had the sense to stay in school and out of trouble knew they were only scratching the surface of something their souls longed for.

Now I run a Hebrew immersive afterschool program in Berkeley called Edah where we serve a number of families with a variety of needs and interests. I talk to parents all the time about what they want for their children and more specifically, what they want their children to get out of their Jewish education. While some parents talk about Hebrew language, others about Jewish practice, and others still about spirituality and prayer, the common denominator is always a desire for their children (and family as well) to find community. That’s why we call the program Edah. Jewish life and learning is fully realized in community, it’s what our constituents, participants, members, and students long for, and the deep engagement we’re looking for hinges on the promise that a meaningful connection to community is possible.

Community is the authentic expression of individuals who come together as a group and then identify membership to that group as an expression who they are as individuals. It requires engagement, results in relationships and is fully realized as kinship. But it’s only as good as the effort and engagement it’s members put into it.
​
As Robert Hunter wrote and as Jerry Garcia sung, “Won’t you try just a little bit harder, couldn’t you try just a little bit more?” The quality of one’s experience in community is entirely dependent on that. The challenge is not to create an ever expanding body of programs, experiences, and products to meet shifting trends. The challenge is to work with individuals in either connecting them to, or helping them realize new expressions of Jewish community, and then inspiring them to engage deeply, to try a little harder, to try just a little bit more.

http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/community-is-not-a-commodity-a-response/

For at least 2,000 years, Judaism has been a text-based religion. Many would argue it’s been longer than that. And, with some exceptions, the language of our texts is Hebrew. Yes, Aramaic plays a part. The Talmud, lots of midrashim and ancient biblical translations often were written in Aramaic — but even then, written in the Hebrew alphabet. It shares many of the same words and cognates, and is at the very least a not-too-distant cousin of Hebrew. For as long as Jews have been calling themselves Jews, we’ve been doing all that Jewish stuff in Hebrew.
Which is why I was surprised to read the April 8 cover story in J., “Hebrew not required.” How can Hebrew and Jewish education be separated from one another?

I understand why some are trying. Jewish day schools are also businesses. Schools need to end the year with balanced budgets, have cash-flow issues and need to make payroll. They have customers who want what they want — and these days, with the overabundance of offerings and opportunities, parents let their children’s schools know what they think they should be teaching more than ever before.

But is it really possible to deliver a Jewish education stripped of the Hebrew language?

In just about every synagogue in the world, Jewish prayer is done in Hebrew. If you ask a random Jewish person on the street, “What is the language of Judaism?” the answer will be “Hebrew.” Hebrew is not simply a second language. Hebrew language skills are the keys that unlock doors to participation in communal prayer and enable deep engagement with the central texts of Judaism. These are essential elements of a meaningful Jewish education. 
At Edah, a small Hebrew immersive afterschool program in Berkeley, we struggle with similar issues. Our families want us to achieve more for their children in less time. We started requiring children to attend four days a week. The market wouldn’t support that, so we reduced the minimum number of days to three, and next year the minimum will be two days. We also have a business to run and are worried about many of the same issues, though on a smaller scale. We move in response to what our constituents and customers ask for, just like any other school, and struggle with the tension between our educational philosophy and market trends. 

The question is: What is Jewish education without Hebrew? And what does a generation of Jews look like who don’t speak the language of our civilization?

http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/77353/opninions-what-is-jewish-education-without-hebrew-language/​

It’s Friday at noon. Five Jewish educators sit around a table discussing their recent experiences using Nonviolent Communication (NVC) to defuse tension among students. One educator tells a success story. Another questions the value of the NVC approach, “how do the kids ever learn that there are consequences to actions?”

A third listens to the two and then exclaims, “I didn’t give practicing the training a good enough chance this week, I’ll need to work harder on that next week.” Another educator sits quietly listening and taking notes while the fifth educator, who’s facilitating the conversation, continues to prod the group with questions about their experience experimenting with this approach.

After lunch the meeting transitions into a daily check-in before the kids arrive. In just over an hour 35 children will be dropped off from a variety of public schools in Berkeley to attend the Edah afterschool program, and the five educators sitting around the table make up a big part of the staff. Edah is a Hebrew-immersive, experiential, Jewish educational afterschool program in Berkeley, California and the five educators described above are part of a new initiative called the Jewish Learning Innovation Corps, JLIC, a two year, full time, paid work-study program for early career Jewish educators.

The Jewish Learning Innovation Corps is an attempt to realize a new way of identifying and investing in early career professionals with lots of potential but little formal training. Through professionalizing the experience of teaching in a part-time setting while providing the highest quality training and professional development, the Jewish Learning Innovation Corps hopes to shift the way we think about outreach, teacher training, and the development of new educators and, ultimately, Jewish educational leaders.

In a recent article titled Take A Chance On Me , Rachel Cyrulnik argued that the Jewish community struggles to afford emerging Jewish communal leaders opportunities for growth. She wrote, “And so our Next Gen leaders find themselves in a Catch 22. They need more leadership experience to be ready to lead, but they can’t get it without furnishing credentials that assure employers that they have the leadership experience required to take on new professional challenges.”

A similar critique can be made of Jewish education. There are lots of part time work opportunities for young people looking to make less than a living wage. There are a number of graduate and certificate programs ranging in price and focus, for those able and willing to make that kind of commitment. Teachers can cobble together a number of teaching gigs if full-time employment is required, but are left without health insurance and other benefits. And for the thousands of graduating college seniors looking for full time employment, interested in exploring career paths before deciding on one, Jewish education offers few opportunities.

This was the challenge that led to the creation of the Jewish Learning Innovation Corps. JLIC was designed to give recent college graduates an opportunity to learn skills often available only to graduate students who commit to a degree program, to practice those skills, and refine them in collaboration with the other fellows and their mentor. The JLIC curriculum provides fellows with intensive training from experts in some of the most exciting and innovative practices in Jewish education, including Philosophical Inquiry, Project Based Learning, Nonviolent Communication, and Hebrew Language Immersion. The fellows then have the opportunity to practice and hone these skills in the classroom, developing and implementing lesson plans, discussing outcomes with their cohort, and incorporating what they have learned into future lessons. This iterative and collaborative process affords Fellows the benefit of an academic and practical experience that allows them to reflect upon what they have learned and refine their new skills. In addition, each JLIC fellow has a particular area of interest and is matched with an experienced professional mentor to guide them in realizing their own professional goals.

We know students learn best through doing. JLIC provides millenials a pathway into Jewish education by introducing early career Jewish educators to a field that is professionalized, characterized by opportunity, and designed to meet the needs of these young educators as they navigate their entry into the working world. 

http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/learning-through-doing-the-jewish-learning-innovation-corps/

When we first decided we were “ready” for children, it was an exciting time.  I remember seeing friends with babies, small children at dinner parties, and thinking that it was my time as well.  I remember romantic dinners with my wife, talking about whether she was or wasn’t pregnant. Those first months were magical.  They were full of promise. 

And at first when the months would pass I thought nothing of it.  Neither did Claire.  It takes time, we’d say to each other, and laugh at some joke about having to practice more.  We’d plan romantic weekends and try to just relax, reading that the biggest issue for couples trying to get pregnant was that they were just too high strung to let it happen.  And yet the ends of months would roll around and silent conversations and knowing looks were shared, with promise and excitement dwindling. 

But we kept at it.  We read all the normal stuff and learned that it can take time and it was no big deal.  But it didn’t happen.  For months it didn’t happen, and a year, and everyone else was pregnant.  What was wrong with us.  Was something wrong with Claire?  Could my sperm be the problem?  Ahhhhhh, there was a problem!

This week is national infertility week. So many of us are silent about our experiences. We tell our pregnancy and birth stories, not our infertility ones. Our communities celebrate birth and newness and life. For many of us, that feels out of reach. 

How can we be more sensitive? What can we do to offer support?

Claire and I successfully got help, we’re lucky, and blessed. Many other people are just like us, also lucky, and many others are not.  This week is about telling our stories and sharing so that we can all feel a little less alone.